 |
| Shaunit Nishant |
n the early 16th century, northern India, being then under mainly Muslim rulers, fell again to the superior mobility and firepower of a new generation of Central Asian warriors. The resulting
Mughal Empire
did not stamp out the local societies it came to rule, but rather
balanced and pacified them through new administrative practices and diverse and inclusive ruling elites, leading to more systematic, centralised, and uniform rule. Eschewing tribal bonds and Islamic identity, especially under
Akbar,
the Mughals united their far-flung realms through loyalty, expressed
through a Persianised culture, to an emperor who had near-divine status. The Mughal state's economic policies, deriving most revenues from agriculture and mandating that taxes be paid in the well-regulated silver currency, caused peasants and artisans to enter larger markets. The relative peace maintained by the empire during much of the 17th century was a factor in India's economic expansion, resulting in greater patronage of
painting, literary forms, textiles, and
architecture. Newly coherent social groups in northern and western India, such as the
Marathas, the
Rajputs, and the
Sikhs,
gained military and governing ambitions during Mughal rule, which,
through collaboration or adversity, gave them both recognition and
military experience.
Expanding commerce during Mughal rule gave rise to new Indian
commercial and political elites along the coasts of southern and eastern
India. As the empire disintegrated, many among these elites were able to seek and control their own affairs.
By the early 18th century, with the lines between commercial and
political dominance being increasingly blurred, a number of European
trading companies, including the English
East India Company, had established coastal outposts.
The East India Company's control of the seas, greater resources, and
more advanced military training and technology led it to increasingly
flex its military muscle and caused it to become attractive to a portion
of the Indian elite; both these factors were crucial in allowing the
Company to gain control over the
Bengal region by 1765 and sideline the other European companies.
Its further access to the riches of Bengal and the subsequent increased
strength and size of its army enabled it to annex or subdue most of
India by the 1820s.
India was then no longer exporting manufactured goods as it long had,
but was instead supplying the British empire with raw materials, and
many historians consider this to be the onset of India's colonial
period.
By this time, with its economic power severely curtailed by the British
parliament and itself effectively made an arm of British
administration, the Company began to more consciously enter non-economic
arenas such as education, social reform, and culture.
Comments
Post a Comment